Key result
Ramipril did not significantly reduce the incidence of diabetes or death compared to placebo in participants with impaired fasting glucose or glucose tolerance (18.1% vs 19.5%; HR 0.91; P=0.15).
Why the study?
Does ramipril reduce the development of diabetes or death in participants without cardiovascular disease but with impaired fasting glucose or impaired glucose tolerance?
RCT (n=5,269)
Double-blind
randomized
Does ramipril reduce the development of diabetes or death in participants without cardiovascular disease but with impaired fasting glucose or impaired glucose tolerance?
Hazard Ratio: 0.91 (95% CI 0.81–1.03)
Absolute Event Rate: 18.1% vs 19.5%
p-value: p=0.15
In patients with impaired fasting glucose or impaired glucose tolerance, ramipril therapy for 3 years did not significantly reduce the incidence of diabetes or death.
Ramipril does not prevent diabetes or death in prediabetes; confirms neutral effect and advises against preventive use.
BACKGROUND: Previous studies have suggested that blockade of the renin-angiotensin system may prevent diabetes in people with cardiovascular disease or hypertension. METHODS: In a double-blind, randomized clinical trial with a 2-by-2 factorial design, we randomly assigned 5269 participants without cardiovascular disease but with impaired fasting glucose levels (after an 8-hour fast) or impaired glucose tolerance to receive ramipril (up to 15 mg per day) or placebo (and rosiglitazone or placebo) and followed them for a median of 3 years. We studied the effects of ramipril on the development of diabetes or death, whichever came first (the primary outcome), and on secondary outcomes, including regression to normoglycemia. RESULTS: The incidence of the primary outcome did not differ significantly between the ramipril group (18.1%) and the placebo group (19.5%; hazard ratio for the ramipril group, 0.91; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.81 to 1.03; P=0.15). Participants receiving ramipril were more likely to have regression to normoglycemia than those receiving placebo (hazard ratio, 1.16; 95% CI, 1.07 to 1.27; P=0.001). At the end of the study, the median fasting plasma glucose level was not significantly lower in the ramipril group (102.7 mg per deciliter [5.70 mmol per liter]) than in the placebo group (103.4 mg per deciliter [5.74 mmol per liter], P=0.07), though plasma glucose levels 2 hours after an oral glucose load were significantly lower in the ramipril group (135.1 mg per deciliter [7.50 mmol per liter] vs. 140.5 mg per deciliter [7.80 mmol per liter], P=0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Among persons with impaired fasting glucose levels or impaired glucose tolerance, the use of ramipril for 3 years does not significantly reduce the incidence of diabetes or death but does significantly increase regression to normoglycemia. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00095654 [ClinicalTrials.gov].).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
A 2006 study conducted an RCT in Impaired fasting glucose levels or impaired glucose tolerance (n=5,269). Ramipril vs. Placebo was evaluated on Development of diabetes or death, whichever came first (HR 0.91, 95% CI 0.81 to 1.03, p=0.15). Ramipril did not significantly reduce the incidence of diabetes or death compared to placebo in participants with impaired fasting glucose or glucose tolerance (18.1% vs 19.5%; HR 0.91; P=0.15).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: