Key result
Thienopyridine discontinuation is linked to similar post-ESD bleeding rates vs continuation at ~2%.
Why the study?
Does guideline-based discontinuation of antiplatelet therapy compared to continuation affect the risk of post-ESD bleeding in patients undergoing esophageal ESD?
Cohort (n=570)
Yes
Does guideline-based discontinuation of antiplatelet therapy compared to continuation affect the risk of post-ESD bleeding in patients undergoing esophageal ESD?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Continuation of antiplatelet therapy during esophageal ESD resulted in low post-ESD bleeding rates comparable to guideline-based discontinuation, suggesting continuation may be safe.
OBJECTIVES: Postendoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) bleeding remains a critical concern in patients receiving antithrombotic therapy, yet the risk after esophageal ESD is poorly characterized. This multicenter retrospective study evaluated the incidence of post-ESD bleeding and thromboembolism in patients undergoing esophageal ESD while receiving antiplatelet therapy. METHODS: We analyzed 570 patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma treated with ESD while on antiplatelet therapy between 2017 and 2022 at 21 institutions in Japan. Patients were categorized into guideline-based discontinuation or continuation, excluding guideline-deviating discontinuation. The primary endpoint was the rate of post-ESD bleeding among thienopyridine users (monotherapy or dual antiplatelet therapy; DAPT) managed with guideline-based discontinuation. Secondary endpoints included bleeding rates according to antiplatelet regimen and thromboembolism incidence. RESULTS: A total of 154, 41, and 375 patients received thienopyridine monotherapy, DAPT, and aspirin monotherapy, respectively. Antiplatelet therapy was continued perioperatively in 32.5%, 31.7%, and 73.1% of these groups. Post-ESD bleeding rates were 2.3% (3/132) and 3.2% (2/63) for guideline-based discontinuation and continuation of thienopyridine users, respectively. Bleeding rates for discontinuation vs. continuation were 0% (0/101) vs. 0.7% (2/274) for aspirin monotherapy, 1.9% (2/104) vs. 4.0% (2/50) for thienopyridine monotherapy, and 3.6% (1/28) vs. 0% (0/13) for DAPT. Thromboembolism occurred in two patients, both receiving aspirin monotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: A substantial number of patients underwent esophageal ESD while continuing antiplatelet therapy. These descriptive findings suggest a need for further evaluation of continued therapy in larger studies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hirai et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (n=570). Guideline-based discontinuation of thienopyridine vs. Continuation of thienopyridine was evaluated on Rate of post-ESD bleeding among thienopyridine users managed with guideline-based discontinuation. Guideline-based discontinuation of thienopyridine during esophageal ESD resulted in a 2.3% post-ESD bleeding rate compared to 3.2% with continuation.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: