ocial scientists have long characterized peasants as politically S passive and uninvolved in day to day political activity.Latin American peasants in particular have been singled out as politically nonparticipant.Fur example, anthropologists Diaz and Potter (1967: 159) state that "In Latin America . . . the striking thing is the relative absence of a sense of association, which makes it extremely difficult for peasants in this area to organize to meet the challenges of the modern world."Similarly, sociologists Landsberger and Hewitt (1970: 559) emphasize that "It is unfortunate but true that peasant organizations have been difficult to establish in Latin America."Political scientists
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Booth et al. (1979) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: