Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Background: Mesenchymal–epithelial transition ( MET ) exon14 skipping mutations represent a clinically unique molecular subtype of NSCLC. The prevalence rates of MET exon 14 skipping in lung adenocarcinoma (ADC) range from 0.9% to 4.0% in Asian populations. Since some somatic variants that do not encompass the MET exon 14 splice sites might also induce MET exon 14 skipping, the RNA-based sequencing is speculated as the most accurate method for detecting exon 14 skipping. Patients and Methods: A total of 951 NSCLC patients from two hospitals were enrolled in this study. MET exon14 skipping was detected using RNA-based next-generation sequencing (NGS). Also, immunohistochemistry (IHC) was performed in 405 samples simultaneously. Results: The overall estimated prevalence of MET exon 14 skipping was approximately 1.8% in ADCs and 1.7% in NSCLCs. The detection rate of MET exon 14 skipping from surgical resection specimen was 2.3% in NSCLCs and 2.0% in ADCs. The MET exon 14 skipping was identified in 6.6% of EGFR / KRAS / ALK / ROS1 / RET -negative ADCs. Additionally, PD-L1 was found to be highly expressed in NSCLC patients harboring MET exon 14 skipping ( P < 0.01). Conclusion: The prevalence of MET exon14 skipping in lung ADCs in the East Asian population was similar to that of the Western population as assessed by RNA-based NGS. The NSCLC patients with MET exon 14 skipping were older than those with other oncogenic driver mutations, such as EGFR, ALK , and ROS1 . In addition, PD-L1 was highly expressed in NSCLC patients with MET exon 14 skipping.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Xu et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: