Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Large-scale chromosomal rearrangements or structural variants (SVs) have shaped the evolution of Avena species, driving domestication and adaptation in oats (Avena sativa L.). The legacy of these reorganizations, including translocations and inversions, remains evident, yet their frequency and impact on phenotypic and genotypic variability in oat breeding populations remain unclear. The objective of this study was to characterize chromosome rearrangements in 1230 oat breeding lines using genotyping-by-sequencing and to utilize this information in genomic loci discovery and prediction. Principal component analysis (PCA) based on single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) identified distinct clusters at the known locations of 1A/1C translocation, 3C inversion, 4C inversion, and 7D inversion. The distribution of the clusters of the four rearrangements in the genome-wide diversity space of our panel confirmed the role of SVs in population structure, with 1A/1C showing the most significant divergence. Suppression of recombination due to SVs was shown by higher linkage disequilibrium (LD) observed in all samples compared to lines within individual SV clusters. Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) identified markers for grain yield and agronomic traits, with some differences among cluster-based populations. Genomic prediction accuracies improved when cross-validation was performed within SV clusters rather than across the entire dataset. However, using SV clusters as covariates did not improve GWAS and prediction accuracies. These results suggest that SVs cause population stratification, reduce recombination rates, hinder gene discovery, and affect genomic prediction accuracy. Characterizing oat germplasm for SVs can improve breeding decisions, from optimizing parental selection to enhancing genomic predictions, accelerating genetic gains for key traits.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Oliveira et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: