Why the study?
Does the presence of a carotid bruit predict moderate or severe internal carotid artery stenosis in patients referred to a cerebrovascular clinic?
Does the presence of a carotid bruit predict moderate or severe internal carotid artery stenosis in patients referred to a cerebrovascular clinic?
A carotid bruit is a poor predictor of clinically significant carotid artery stenosis, indicating that all patients with suspected carotid territory ischemia should undergo imaging regardless of auscultation findings.
Carotid bruit was associated with stenosis but low PPV and high false negatives; leaves open whether auscultation can triage imaging decisions in cerebrovascular clinics.
A carotid bruit is often thought of as a reliable sign of extracranial carotid artery disease. In addition finding a bruit may precipitate a referral to hospital. Carotid endarterectomy has now been shown to be beneficial in patients with symptomatic carotid territory ischaemia and 70-99% stenosis of the relevant carotid artery, therefore it is important that such patients are detected and referred. In this study of 331 consecutive patients referred to a specialist cerebrovascular clinic we examined the practical value of a carotid bruit mentioned by the referring practitioner. All patients underwent clinical assessment, evaluation of risk factors and Doppler duplex scanning of the carotid arteries. A bruit was stated in the referral letter of 110 (33%) patients. Moderate (30-69%) or severe (70-99%) stenosis was present in 37% of patients with, and 17% of those without a carotid bruit (P < 0.001). We found a carotid bruit was a poor predictor of such disease (positive predictive value, 37%). The false negative rate for severe disease was 43%. Normal carotid arteries were found in 32% of patients with a bruit. We therefore suggest that all patients with suspected carotid territory ischaemia should be referred for assessment whether there is a bruit present or not.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Davies et al. (1994) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: