Key result
Children with pallid breath-holding spells exhibited significant differences in heart rate variability parameters compared to those with cyanotic spells (p<0.05).
Why the study?
Does heart rate variability differ between children with breath-holding spells (cyanotic or pallid) and healthy controls?
Observational (n=107)
Does heart rate variability differ between children with breath-holding spells (cyanotic or pallid) and healthy controls?
p-value: p=<0.05
Children with pallid breath-holding spells exhibit significant differences in heart rate variability compared to those with cyanotic spells, highlighting the utility of 24-hour Holter monitoring for evaluating autonomic dysregulation in this population.
Supports distinct autonomic profiles in pallid versus cyanotic spells; leaves open differentiation from controls and any clinical role for HRV monitoring.
PURPOSE: Previous studies have shown that the underlying pathophysiologic mechanism in children with breath holding may be generalised autonomic dysregulation. Thus, we performed cardiac rhythm and heart rate variability analyses using 24-hour Holter monitoring to evaluate the cardiac effects of autonomic dysregulation in children with breath-holding spells. METHODS: We performed cardiac rhythm and heart rate analyses using 24-hour Holter monitors to evaluate the cardiac effects of autonomic dysregulation in children during a breath-holding spell. Our study group consisted of 68 children with breath-holding spells - 56 cyanotic type and 12 pallid type - and 39 healthy controls. RESULTS: Clinical and heart rate variability results were compared between each spell type - cyanotic or pallid - and the control group; significant differences (p<0.05) in standard deviation of all NN intervals, mean of the standard deviations of all NN intervals for all 5-minute segments, percentage of differences between adjacent RR intervals >50 ms, and square root of the mean of the sum of squares of the differences between adjacent NN intervals values were found between the pallid and cyanotic groups. CONCLUSIONS: Holter monitoring for 24 hours and heart rate variability parameters, particularly in children with pallid spells, are crucial for evaluation of cardiac rhythm changes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yılmaz et al. (2013) conducted an observational in Breath-holding spells (n=107). Breath-holding spells vs. Healthy controls and other spell types was evaluated on Heart rate variability parameters (SDNN, SDANN, pNN50, RMSSD) (p=<0.05). Children with pallid breath-holding spells exhibited significant differences in heart rate variability parameters compared to those with cyanotic spells (p<0.05).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: