Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
On the basis of the color‐coded visualization of molecular electrostatic (MEP) and lipophilicity potential (MLP) profiles, the structural differences and similarities between cyclo‐β(1→2)‐fructohexaoside (α‐cyclofructin, 1 ) and its backbone‐derived 18‐crown‐6 ether and the cyclodextrins are outlined. Unlike α‐cyclodextrin, α‐cyclofructin exhibits no central cavity with which to form inclusion complexes. Rather, it has a pronounced “front/back” differentiation of hydrophobic and hydrophilic surface regions. In agreement with experimental observations, the MEP shows not only that the crown ether‐type properties of α‐cyclofructin are well‐suited for the complexation of metal cations, but also that there is a pronounced regioselectivity for their incorporation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Immel et al. (1996) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: