Objective To determine whether fenoldopam and N-acetylcysteine prevent renal deterioration and improve hospital outcome for patients with chronic renal insufficiency undergoing cardiac surgery. Design Prospective, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial. Setting A community hospital that is a cardiac referral center. Patients Seventy-nine adult patients with chronic renal insufficiency (creatinine clearance < or = 40 mL/min) who underwent cardiac surgery. Interventions Group 1 received intravenous fenoldopam 0.1 microg/kg/min started at surgical induction and continued for 48 hrs. Group 2 received N-acetylcysteine 600 mg orally twice a day, from preoperative day 1 to postoperative day 1. Group 3 received both fenoldopam and N-acetylcysteine, and group 4 patients served as controls. Measurements and main results Using multiple comparisons (analysis of variance) with change scores, and statistically adjusting for group differences in aortic cross-clamp time, use of intraoperative aprotinin, and preoperative use of statin, we found that the change in creatinine clearance from preoperative to postoperative day 3 was statistically less for group 1 (-1.47 mL/min +/- 2.06 SE, p = .0286) and for group 2 (-0.67 mL/min +/- 2.11 SE, p = .0198) and less but not quite significant for group 3 (-3.08 mL/min +/- 1.95 SE, p = .0891) compared with controls (-8.15 mL/min +/- 2.18 SE). Furthermore, the adjusted weight gain on postoperative day 3 was 5.55 kg +/- 1.00 SE (p = .0988) for group 1, 5.06 kg +/- 1.06 SE (p = .0631) for group 2, and 5.14 kg +/- .91 SE (p = .0445) for group 3 compared with 8.03 kg +/- 1.07 SE for group 4. However, there was no decrease in length of critical care or hospital stay or hospital costs. Finally, fenoldopam contributed to perioperative hypotension. Conclusions Perioperative fenoldopam and N-acetylcysteine abrogate the early postoperative decline in renal function of patients who have chronic renal insufficiency, although these agents do not affect other parameters of cardiac surgical outcome.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Barr et al. (2008) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: