Key result
Review by an inpatient heart failure team significantly increased the likelihood of receiving all four pillars of heart failure therapy within 30 days of discharge (96.8% vs 0%; p<0.001).
Why the study?
Heart failure management has shifted toward early, intensive initiation of therapy, but the impact of inpatient heart failure team review on outcomes remains to be evaluated.
Does review by an inpatient heart failure team improve the rapid initiation of all four pillars of heart failure therapy in patients with a new diagnosis of heart failure?
Cohort
No
Does review by an inpatient heart failure team improve the rapid initiation of all four pillars of heart failure therapy in patients with a new diagnosis of heart failure?
Absolute Event Rate: 96.8% vs 0%
p-value: p=<0.001
Inpatient heart failure team review significantly increases the rapid initiation of all four pillars of guideline-directed medical therapy for new heart failure, albeit with a longer hospital stay.
The management of heart failure (HF) has undergone a paradigm shift from conventional stepwise methods of initiation and the up-titration of HF therapy towards an early, more intensive initiation of pharmacotherapy to improve the prognosis. The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of patients at the Liverpool Heart and Chest Hospital (LHCH), with new diagnosis of HF, who were reviewed by the inpatient heart failure team (HFT), compared to patients that were not reviewed. A retrospective review of the electronic records of patients admitted with a new diagnosis of HF to the LHCH from May to December 2023 was performed. Admission drugs were similar, apart from betablockers, which were more frequent in the non-HFT group (58% vs. 24.2%; p = 0.002). The length of inpatient stay was longer in the HFT group (median 5.5 days vs. 3 days; p = 0.001) and more likely to be on all four pillars of HF medical therapy (96.8% vs. 0; p < 0.001) within 30 days of discharge. The 30-day and 6-month mortality outcomes were not significantly different. Patients reviewed by the HFT were significantly more likely to receive the four pillars of HF therapy within 30 days of their diagnosis compared to their counterparts at the expense of a longer length of stay.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhou et al. (2025) conducted a cohort in New diagnosis of heart failure. Review by inpatient heart failure team (HFT) vs. No review by inpatient heart failure team was evaluated on Prescription of all four pillars of heart failure medical therapy within 30 days of discharge (p=<0.001). Review by an inpatient heart failure team significantly increased the likelihood of receiving all four pillars of heart failure therapy within 30 days of discharge (96.8% vs 0%; p<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: