Sound transmission losses for a single layer wall are measured in a reverberation room facility using conventional methods (ASTM E90) and the more recently introduced sound intensity method. The specimen is placed in five positions in the tunnel between the two reverberation rooms and measurements are made for four different absorptive conditions in the smaller room. Significant differences between the two measurement techniques are found at low frequencies and at high frequencies. Low-frequency differences are attributed partly to the increase in sound energy close to the surfaces of the receiving room (the Waterhouse effect) and the lack of any consideration of this in standard test methods. Inclusion of the Waterhouse term in the conventional transmission loss formula improves the agreement between the conventional and the sound intensity measurement technique at low frequencies. High-frequency differences are not explained.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Halliwell et al. (1985) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: