Key result
Intracardiac echocardiography-guided radio-frequency catheter ablation significantly increased the first transseptal puncture success rate to 100% compared to 87.2% with traditional fluoroscopy.
Why the study?
Intracardiac echocardiography has been used to guide radio-frequency catheter ablation for better catheter navigation and less radiation exposure during atrial fibrillation treatment, but real-world evaluation was needed.
Does intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) guided RFCA improve procedural outcomes and reduce radiation exposure compared to traditional fluoroscopy in patients with atrial fibrillation?
Cohort (n=227)
No
Does intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) guided RFCA improve procedural outcomes and reduce radiation exposure compared to traditional fluoroscopy in patients with atrial fibrillation?
Absolute Event Rate: 100% vs 87.2%
p-value: p=0.041
Intracardiac echocardiography-guided radio-frequency catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation significantly improves first transseptal puncture success and reduces radiation exposure compared to traditional fluoroscopy.
ICE selection factors in AF ablation warrant procedural caution; leaves open comparative effectiveness versus fluoroscopy.
Intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) has been used to guide radio-frequency catheter ablation (RFCA) for better catheter navigation and less radiation exposure in treating atrial fibrillation (AF). This retrospective cohort study enrolled 227 AF patients undergoing ICE- or traditional fluoroscopy (TF)-guided RFCA for AF in a tertiary hospital. ICE was used more often in patients with atrial tachycardia [odds ratio (OR) 3.692, p = 0.062], a higher score of Hypertension, Abnormal renal/liver function, Stroke, Bleeding history or predisposition, Labile INR, Elderly, Drugs/alcohol concomitantly (OR 1.541, p = 0.050), or heart failure (OR 2.098, p = 0.156). Based on the comparisons of 47 propensity score-matched pairs from 156 patients only undergoing pulmonary vein isolation (PVI), patients using ICE exhibited a significantly higher success rate in the first transseptal puncture (100% vs. 87.2%, p = 0.041) and less radiation exposure [utilization of radiographic contrast agent (2.7 ml vs. 6.0 ml, p < 0.001), fluoroscopy time (5.7 min vs. 7.6 min, p = 0.026), and fluoroscopy dose (208.4 mGy vs. 332.3 mGy, p = 0.024)] than patients using TF. Other perioperative efficacy outcomes (PVI success, free from AF after RFCA and complications) showed no difference between the matched pairs. ICE can enhance procedural safety and efficiency of RFCA, particularly for more complex patient profiles, in real-world setting.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tong et al. (2024) conducted a cohort in Atrial fibrillation (n=227). Intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) guided radio-frequency catheter ablation vs. Traditional fluoroscopy (TF) guided radio-frequency catheter ablation was evaluated on First transseptal puncture success (p=0.041). Intracardiac echocardiography-guided radio-frequency catheter ablation significantly increased the first transseptal puncture success rate to 100% compared to 87.2% with traditional fluoroscopy.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: