Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
BACKGROUND: Gram-negative bloodstream infections (GNBSIs) are an important cause of healthcare-associated infection in intensive care units (ICUs), with increasing resistance to broad-spectrum antibiotics observed. There is a need to understand how resistance differs in ICUs to help inform decision-making on antimicrobial use in this setting. METHODS: Reports of Escherichia coli, Klebsiella spp., and Pseudomonas aeruginosa GNBSIs between 2017 and 2024 were linked to hospital data to determine ICU-associated bloodstream infections (ICU-BSIs; including high-dependency units) and to laboratory data to obtain antimicrobial susceptibility results. We estimated GNBSI incidence over time and compared resistance in ICU-BSIs against non-ICU hospital-onset bloodstream infections (niHO-BSIs). RESULTS: Of the 381,810 GNBSIs identified, 6325 (1.7%) were ICU-BSIs, representing 7.5% of hospital-onset BSIs. ICU-BSI incidence varied by pathogen and across the study period. Incidence of Klebsiella spp. and P. aeruginosa ICU-BSIs increased by 104% and 65%, respectively, between 2019/20 and 2020/21, before returning towards baseline levels. Incidence of E. coli ICU-BSIs remained stable before a small reduction in 2022/23. P. aeruginosa ICU-BSIs were more resistant than niHO-BSIs to ceftazidime (13.7% vs 9.0%), piperacillin/tazobactam (15.4% vs 10.3%), and carbapenems (18.9% vs 11.1%). CONCLUSIONS: Rates of GNBSIs have varied by pathogen since 2017, with increases during the COVID-19 pandemic. Resistance to several antibiotics, including carbapenem resistance in P. aeruginosa, was higher in ICU-BSIs than in niHO-BSIs. The finding of elevated resistance highlights the need to identify risk factors for AMR in this setting.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wilson et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: