Three methods for non-adiabatic dynamics are compared to highlight their capabilities. Multi-configurational time-dependent Hartree is a full grid-based solution to the time-dependent Schrödinger equation, variational multi-configurational Gaussian (vMCG) uses a less flexible but unrestricted Gaussian wavepacket basis, and trajectory surface hopping (TSH) replaces the nuclear wavepacket with a swarm of classical trajectories. Calculations with all methods using a model Hamiltonian were performed. The vMCG and TSH were also then run in a direct dynamics mode, with the potential energy surfaces calculated on-the-fly using quantum chemistry calculations. All dynamics calculations used the Q uantics package, with the TSH calculations using a new interface to a surface hopping code. A novel approach to calculate adiabatic populations from grid-based quantum dynamics using a time-dependent discrete variable representation is presented, allowing a proper comparison of methods. This article is part of the theme issue ‘Chemistry without the Born–Oppenheimer approximation’.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Coonjobeeharry et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: