Key result
Apixaban was equally efficacious to enoxaparin in preventing venous thromboembolism after total hip or knee arthroplasty, but demonstrated a better safety profile.
Why the study?
Both apixaban and enoxaparin are standard therapies for deep-vein thrombosis prophylaxis, but the superiority of one over the other remains controversial in patients undergoing total hip and knee arthroplasty.
RCT (n=96)
randomly allocated
Apixaban may be a safer alternative to enoxaparin for post-arthroplasty VTE prophylaxis; leaves open need for larger multicenter confirmation.
Both apixaban and enoxaparin are Food and Drug Administration-approved standard therapy for prophylaxis of deep-vein thrombosis; however, the superiority of one over the other is still controversial. With an objective to observe efficacy and safety outcomes of apixaban and enoxaparin in patients undergoing total hip (THA) and knee (TKA) arthroplasty, 96 patients undergoing THA/TKA (October 2018 to August 2019) were randomly allocated into 2 groups; (n = 48) apixaban; and (n = 48) enoxaparin. Efficacy outcomes and safety outcomes were recorded at 2 and 5 weeks post-TKA/THA. Follow-up functional scoring was done at 6 months postoperatively. Apixaban and enoxaparin were found to be equally efficacious in preventing venous thromboembolism; however, apixaban had a better safety profile. The apixaban group had nonsignificant higher tendency for wound discharge, atrial fibrillation and transient ischaemic attack. Enoxaparin had nonsignificant greater tendency for bleeding, wound dehiscence and pulmonary complications. Apixaban is a safe alternative to conventionally used enoxaparin for chemoprophylaxis in patients undergoing THA or TKA.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kunal et al. (2021) conducted an RCT in Total hip and knee arthroplasty (n=96). Apixaban vs. Enoxaparin was evaluated on Venous thromboembolism. Apixaban was equally efficacious to enoxaparin in preventing venous thromboembolism after total hip or knee arthroplasty, but demonstrated a better safety profile.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: