Cultural representation of the non-Western Other lies at the core of Western colonial and neocolonial discourses. A critical political analysis of the Western imagination of the Other involves a recognition at two levels—the practices of essentializing and stereotyping that provide the backbone as well as various strategies (such as infantilization, eroticization, debasement, idealization, and self-affirmation) that put flesh to the imagined Other. The strategies are not fixed ahistorically but nevertheless remain stable over a period of time. In this article, I identify significant rhetorical strategies that characterize Western representations of the (non-Western) Other, focusing mainly on Western colonial representations, and substantiate it through the empirical study of Exotica Tibet (a shorthand for exoticized Western representations of Tibet).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dibyesh Anand (2007) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context:
More from New Political Science