Twenty-one 10th graders selected as opinion leaders by their peers in a rural county in a southern state participated in a 36-hour peer-educator training program Students Together Against Negative Decisions (STAND) based on diffusion of innovations theory and the transtheoretical model. Comparison subjects received either a 22-hour leadership training course (n = 20) or no intervention (n = 45). STAND and comparison subjects completed a 154-item written knowledge, attitude, and behavior survey at the beginning of the training (Time 1), at the end of the training (Time 2), and again 8 months later (Time 3). One hundred and sixty-seven other 9th and 10th graders in the intervention county and 74 in the comparison county completed an abbreviated telephone interview at Time 1 and Time 3. At Time 3 STAND-trained peer educators reported significantly greater increases in AIDS Risk Behavior Knowledge (more than 4 times comparison groups), frequency of conversations with peers about birth control/condoms (+180% vs. +12%) and sexually transmitted diseases (STDs; +282% vs. -33%), condom use self efficacy (+16% vs. -1%), and consistent condom use (+28% vs. +15%). STAND teens also reported substantial favorable trends at Time 3, including increased condom use (+213% vs. +31%) and decreased unprotected intercourse (-30% vs. +29%). At Time 3 teens in the intervention county reported significantly greater increases in the number of people who talked with friends in the preceding 3 months about STDs (+39% vs. -19%) or with a parent/adult about sex (+6% vs. -37%). Intervention county teens also reported a substantial but nonsignificant 2.6-fold greater increase in condom use at last intercourse (+64% vs. +25%) but unfavorable changes in other risk behaviors. The STAND peer-educator training program appears to be an effective method for improving selected sexual knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors among participant teenagers in the rural South.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Smith et al. (2000) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: