Key result
Elevated baseline GlycA levels (top vs. bottom quartile) predicted an increased risk of future metabolic syndrome over 9-10 years in both adolescent (OR 1.95) and young adult (OR 2.74) cohorts.
Why the study?
Low-grade inflammation in the young may contribute to adverse cardiometabolic risk profiles, but whether GlycA better detects these changes compared with CRP, and whether relationships differ between adolescents and young adults, was unclear.
Do elevated baseline glycoprotein acetyl (GlycA) levels predict adverse cardiometabolic profiles and risk of metabolic syndrome in adolescents and young adults?
Cohort (n=3,306)
Yes
Do elevated baseline glycoprotein acetyl (GlycA) levels predict adverse cardiometabolic profiles and risk of metabolic syndrome in adolescents and young adults?
GlycA may be a more sensitive and stable inflammatory biomarker than CRP for detecting early cardiometabolic risk and predicting future metabolic syndrome in young populations.
GlycA may aid early MetS risk detection in youth; hypothesis-generating and should not change practice.
Objective Low-grade inflammation in the young may contribute to the early development of adverse cardiometabolic risk profiles. We assessed whether measures of glycoprotein acetylation (GlycA) were better able to detect the development of these changes compared to the more commonly used biomarker high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (CRP), and investigated whether these relationships differed in an adolescent compared to young adult cohort. Research Design and Methods A total of 3306 adolescents (Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children - ALSPAC; mean age 15.4±0.3; n=1750) and young adults (Cardiovascular Risk in Young Finns Study - YFS; mean age 32.1±5.0; n=1556) were included. Inflammatory biomarkers (GlycA/CRP), body composition (BMI / waist circumference) and cardiometabolic risk factors (blood pressure, triglycerides, HDL-c, glucose, insulin, and homeostasis model of insulin resistance [HOMA_IR]), were measured at baseline and again in 9-10 year follow-up. Metabolic Syndrome (MetS) was defined using adolescent-specific National Cholesterol Education Programme (NCEP) guidelines in ALSPAC and standard NCEP guidelines in YFS. Results GlycA levels showed greater within-subject correlation over the 9-10 year duration of follow-up in both cohorts when compared to CRP, particularly in the younger adolescent group. In adjusted models, only GlycA was found to increase in line with cardiometabolic risk factor burden at baseline, and to predict adverse changes in several cardiometabolic risk factors in follow-up. In both cohorts, GlycA predicted future risk of MetS (OR [95%CI] for Q4 vs. Q1 = 1.95 [1.08,3.53] and 2.74 [1.30,5.73] for ALSPAC and YFS, respectively), whereas CRP showed a neutral or even negative relationship in fully-adjusted models (OR [95%CI] = 0.50 [0.29,0.86] and 0.93 [0.53,1.64]). Conclusions Chronic inflammation is associated with adverse cardiometabolic risk profiles from as early as adolescence and predicts risk of future cardiometabolic risk and MetS in up to 10 year follow-up. GlycA may be a more sensitive inflammatory biomarker to CRP for detecting early cardiometabolic and cardiovascular risk in the young.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chiesa et al. (2020) conducted a cohort in Metabolic Syndrome and Cardiometabolic Risk (n=3,306). Elevated glycoprotein acetylation (GlycA) vs. Lowest quartile of GlycA (Q1) was evaluated on Future risk of Metabolic Syndrome (MetS) in the ALSPAC cohort (Q4 vs Q1 GlycA) (OR 1.95, 95% CI 1.08-3.53). Elevated baseline GlycA levels (top vs. bottom quartile) predicted an increased risk of future metabolic syndrome over 9-10 years in both adolescent (OR 1.95) and young adult (OR 2.74) cohorts.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: