Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
December 24, 2016Journal of Prosthetic DentistryOpen Access

Randomized controlled within-subject evaluation of digital and conventional workflows for the fabrication of lithium disilicate single crowns. Part II: CAD-CAM versus conventional laboratory procedures

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

ISIrena SailerGBGoran I. BenićVFVincent Fehmer

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Cite This Study

Sailer et al. (2016) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a7dd08387be3f923b5ca54ahttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.09.031
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Microtechnologies in implant and restorative dentistry: A stroll through a digital dental landscape2010 · 19 citations
  2. 2Time-Efficiency Analysis Comparing Digital and Conventional Workflows for Implant Crowns: A Prospective Clinical Crossover Trial2015 · 139 citations
  3. 3Rationale for the Use of CAD/CAM Technology in Implant Prosthodontics2013 · 76 citations
  4. 4Complete digital workflow for the production of implant‐supported single‐unit monolithic crowns2013 · 120 citations
  5. 5Digital vs. conventional implant impressions: efficiency outcomes2012 · 308 citations