This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
OBJECTIVE: Development of a feasible, accurate method to assess pediatric asthma severity would benefit clinical care and research. This study sought to determine pediatric asthma severity from retrospective electronic health record prescription data, and to compare severities before and after the 2020 National Asthma Education and Prevention Program (NAEPP) guideline update. METHODS: This retrospective analysis included patients ages 2 - 18 years of age from a large, multi-center healthcare provider. We assessed severity by mapping asthma-related medication prescriptions with NAEPP step-up therapy guidelines. We compared severities between the 2007 NAEPP guideline (2011-2020) and 2020 NAEPP guideline (2021-2023) periods. RESULTS: ∼5% decrease in mild persistent and moderate persistent severity, and a large increase in undefined severity from 7.0% to 19.6% after the 2020 NAEPP update. CONCLUSIONS: This study's approach using outpatient medication prescription data to determine pediatric asthma severity according to NAEPP guidelines classified over 90% of patients. After the 2020 NAEPP guideline update, we found decreases in the proportion of children having mild and moderate persistent severity, and a large increase in patients for whom severity could not be determined due to off-label prescriptions. Mapping pediatric asthma severity through medication prescriptions is feasible, but further work is required to understand off-label prescribing patterns in pediatric asthma.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pan et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: