Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The inclusion complexes of β-cyclodextrin (β-CD) with pyrazinamide (PYA) and piperazine (PIZ) have been investigated both in the solid phase by single-crystal X-ray diffraction analysis and in the gas phase by semi-empirical PM3 calculation. In the crystalline phase, the disordered PYA and PIZ molecules are entirely embedded in the β-CD cavity. The PYA pyrazine-centre displaces upwards by 1.15(1) Å from the β-CD plane, whereas the PIZ centre shifts downwards by 0.76(1) Å from the β-CD plane. The inclusion scenario changed in the gas phase. Two inclusion geometries of the PYA molecule are comparatively stable with binding energies of − 22.28 and − 25.29 kJ mol− 1: the pyrazine centre shifts upwards by 0.5 Å and downwards by 2.0 Å from the β-CD plane. The PIZ molecule positioning at 2.0 Å below the β-CD plane gives a more stable inclusion complex than does the PYA molecule by 22–25 kJ mol− 1. Structural distinction of the β-CD–PYA and β-CD–PIZ inclusion complexes in the solid phase (by X-ray crystallography) and gas phase (by PM3 calculation) is a paradigm of the CD conformational flexibility, the induced-fit mechanism and the dynamics of the inclusion process.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Aree et al. (2008) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: