Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
In this issue of Diabetes Care , Linnebjerg et al. (1) compare the pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) of a Lilly synthetized insulin glargine (LY IGlar) with the insulin glargine Lantus (IGlar) based on a series of clamp studies in healthy volunteers and conclude for PK/PD that there is similarity of the LY IGlar vs. IGlar. The strengths of the study should be discussed along with its limitations. The strengths of the study are several. First, there are consistent rate ratios of geometric means of the several PK/PD parameters of LY IGlar and IGlar examined, which are all close to 1.0, with the 90% CIs contained in the prespecified acceptance limits of 0.80–1.25. Second, there is an elevated number of subjects studied with the technique of euglycemic clamp ( N = 211) and the study design (randomized, double-blind, two-treatment, four periods, crossover) is strong. Third, the comparison between LY IGlar and IGlar is repeated twice (one time vs. European Union [EU]-approved IGlar, the other time vs. US-approved IGlar), and there is the unique comparison between EU-approved IGlar and US-approved IGlar. Of note, the authors not only demonstrate PK/PD similarity between LY IGlar and IGlar but also originally prove the intraindividual similarity (reproducibility) of different batches of IGlar (EU- and US-approved IGlar both originate from the same manufacturer, Sanofi in Frankfurt, Germany). The limitations of the study by Linnebjerg et al. (1) derive from study design and population studied. The conclusions are correct in the specific conditions examined in this study, i.e., normal volunteers without diabetes, a single insulin injection, a dose of 0.5 units/kg (supra-therapeutic, at least for subjects with type 1 diabetes [T1D]), and an insulin dose given in the morning. It is our opinion that one should be cautious regarding the results when extrapolating to the general population of …
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Porcellati et al. (2015) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: