Key result
Indirect insulin resistance indexes accurately identify metabolic syndrome, led by TyG with ~0.89 AUC.
Observational (n=665)
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
PURPOSE: Obesity and insulin resistance are considered cardinal to the pathophysiology of metabolic syndrome. Several simple indexes of insulin resistance calculated from biochemical or anthropometric variables have been proposed. The study aimed to assess the diagnostic accuracy of indirect insulin resistance indicators in detecting metabolic syndrome in non-diabetic patients, including TG/HDLc, METS-IR, TyG, TyG-BMI, TyG-WC, TyG-WHtR, and new indicators TyG-NC (TyG-neck circumference) and TyG-NHtR (Tyg-neck circumference to height ratio). METHODS: The diagnostic accuracy of eight insulin resistance indexes was assessed using the receiver operating characteristic curves (ROC curves) in 665 adult non-diabetic patients. Then, the analysis was performed after the division into groups with proper body mass index, overweight and obese. RESULTS: All indexes achieved significant diagnostic accuracy, with the highest AUC (area under the curve) for TyG (0.888) and Tg/HDLc (0.874). The highest diagnostic performance in group with the proper body mass index was shown for TyG (0.909) and TyG-BMI (0.879). The highest accuracy in the group of overweight individuals was presented by TyG (0.884) and TG/HDLc (0.855). TG/HDLc and TyG showed the highest AUC (0.880 and 0.877, respectively) in the group with obesity. Both TyG-NC and TyG-NHtR reached significant areas under the curve, which makes them useful diagnostic tests in metabolic syndrome. CONCLUSIONS: Indirect indices of insulin resistance, including proposed TyG-NC and TyG-NHtR, show an essential diagnostic value in diagnosing metabolic syndrome. TyG and TG/HDLc seem to be the most useful in the Caucasian population.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mirr et al. (2021) conducted an observational in Metabolic syndrome (n=665). Indirect insulin resistance indexes (TG/HDLc, METS-IR, TyG, TyG-BMI, TyG-WC, TyG-WHtR, TyG-NC, TyG-NHtR) was evaluated on Diagnostic accuracy for detecting metabolic syndrome (measured by ROC AUC) (AUC 0.888 (TyG), AUC 0.874 (TG/HDLc)). Indirect insulin resistance indexes, including TyG-NC and TyG-NHtR, showed significant accuracy in diagnosing metabolic syndrome, led by TyG (AUC 0.888) and TG/HDLc (AUC 0.874).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: