Alcohol dehydrogenase (ADH) catalyses the rate-determining reaction in ethanol metabolism. Genetic association studies of diverse ethnic groups have firmly demonstrated that the allelic variant ADH1B*2 significantly protects against alcoholism but that ADH1C*1, which is in linkage with ADH1B*2, produces a negligible protection. The influence of other potential candidate genes/alleles within the human ADH family, ADH1B*3 and ADH2, remains unclear or controversial. To address this question, functionalities of ADH1B3 and ADH2 were assessed at a physiological level of coenzyme and substrate range. Ethanol-oxidizing activities of recombinant ADH1B1, ADH1B2, ADH1B3, ADH1C1, ADH1C2 and ADH2 were determined at pH 7.5 in the presence of 0.5 mm NAD with 2-50 mm ethanol. The activity differences between ADH1B2 and ADH1B1 were taken as a threshold for effective protection against alcoholism and those between ADH1C1 and ADH1C2 as a threshold for null protection. Over 2-50 mm ethanol, the activities of ADH1B3 were found 2.9-23-fold lower than those of ADH1B2, largely attributed to the Km effect (ADH1B2, 1.8 mm; ADH1B3, 61 mm). Strikingly, the ADH1B3 activity was only 84% that of ADH1B1 at a low ethanol concentration, 2 mm, but increased 10-fold at 50 mm. Corrected for relative expression levels of the enzyme in liver, the hepatic ADH2 activities were estimated to be 18-97% those of ADH1B1 over 2-50 mm ethanol and were 28-140% of the activity differences between ADH1C1 and ADH1C2. The assessment based on the proposed functional window for the human ADH gene family indicates that ADH1B*3 may show some degree of protection against alcoholism and that the ADH2 functional variants appear to be negligible for this protection.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lee et al. (2004) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: