Why the study?
Prostate cancer often impairs health-related quality of life, and online tools may help support self-management skills to improve these outcomes.
Does iManage-PC improve self-efficacy and health-related quality of life in men with clinically localized prostate cancer?
Does iManage-PC improve self-efficacy and health-related quality of life in men with clinically localized prostate cancer?
An online symptom monitoring and self-management tool is feasible, acceptable, and may improve self-efficacy and quality of life in men with localized prostate cancer.
Supports digital self-management tools in prostate cancer; hypothesis-generating and requires RCT confirmation before practice change.
BACKGROUND: Prostate cancer (PC) often impacts 4 major aspects of health-related quality of life (HRQL): urinary, sexual, and bowel dysfunction, and anxiety. Online tools may be helpful in supporting the development of self-management skills that can improve HRQL. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to develop and pilot-test an online symptom monitoring and self-management program, iManage-PC. METHODS: A literature search, input from experts, and feedback from patients were used to develop iManage-PC. A 4-week, single-arm pilot study was conducted with 96 men with prostate cancer. We evaluated system usability, acceptance, and satisfaction and examined preliminary effects on patient-reported outcomes. RESULTS: Rates of retention (94.8%) and adherence to symptom monitoring (95.0%-97.0%) were high. Most participants rated the tool as satisfactory and acceptable (81.2%-94.3%). Related-samples Wilcoxon signed rank tests revealed that participants reported increased self-efficacy related to their ability to manage their adverse effects (T = 1772.0, P < .001, r = 0.39), physical discomfort (T = 1259.0, P < .001, r = 0.40), and stress and worry (T = 1108.5, P = .001, r = 0.34). Global mental and physical health also improved (T = 1322.0, P = .032, r = 0.23, and T = 1409.0, P = .001, r = 0.35, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Future research with such tools should examine the potential role of cut-score-derived management interventions to improve engagement, symptom management self-efficacy, and HRQL. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Our findings are consistent with a growing body of literature that supports the feasibility and acceptability of remotely delivered interventions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Murphy et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: