Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
PURPOSE: To determine the incidence, ocular surface disease associations, microbiological profile, and clinical course of postoperative infections after implantation of the Boston type 1 keratoprosthesis (KPro-1). METHODS: A retrospective chart review was conducted of all cases of the KPro-1 performed at a tertiary eye care center between January 1, 2008, and December 31, 2014. RESULTS: Seventy-five KPro-1 procedures were included in the analysis. Postoperative infections occurred in 13 eyes (17.3%) with an incidence of 0.064 cases per eye-year. The Kaplan-Meier probability of an infection-free graft was 0.96, 0.90, 0.88, 0.87, and 0.86 at years 1 through 5, respectively. The rate of infections was greater in eyes with ocular surface disease (26.3% vs. 8.1%, P = 0.06), especially in those with a history of chemical or thermal injury or herpes zoster keratopathy (P = 0.001). There were 8 cases (10.7%) of microbial keratitis due to either fungi (5 cases) or bacteria (3 cases). There were 7 cases (9.3%) of endophthalmitis due to bacteria (5 cases) or intraocular extension of fungal keratitis (2 cases). The incidence of microbial keratitis and endophthalmitis was 0.034 and 0.03 cases per eye-year, respectively. Therapeutic management of the infected eyes required graft and device removal in 7 eyes (53.8%). After completion of microbiologic treatment, 7 eyes (53.8%) had lost more than 2 lines of the best-corrected preinfection visual acuity, including 5 eyes with endophthalmitis that had hand motion vision or worse. CONCLUSIONS: Postoperative infections are a serious issue that compromises device retention and visual outcomes after keratoprosthesis implantation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wagoner et al. (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: