This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
PURPOSE: Colors have been shown to improve reading performance; however, the effect of colors on Arabic orthography has not been studied. This study aimed to design and create a chromatic acuity chart to evaluate the effect of chromatic contrast on Arabic reading performance. METHODS: Color selection for the newly developed chromatic acuity chart was based on the contrast between the L, M, and S cones. The colors were chosen to have a luminance of approximately 13.6 cd/m 2 with red text on a green background. A Pantone color guide set was used to choose the colors. Fifteen healthy individuals aged 19–27 years were recruited. Reading performance was measured using the newly developed red-green (R-G) chart and compared with the original achromatic Balsam Alabdulkader-Leat (BAL) chart with a luminance of 95 cd/m 2 . The outcomes were maximum reading speed in standard-length words per minute (SLWPM), reading acuity (RA), and critical print size (CPS). RESULTS: The mean R-G SLWPM of 201 wpm was similar to that of the BAL chart ( P < 0.05). The mean RA for the R-G chart was − 0.05 logMAR and − 0.20 logMAR for the BAL chart ( P < 0.05). The CPS for the R-G chart was 0.36 logMAR, significantly higher than the original chart of 0.17 logMAR ( P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: This study showed that the reading performance for a text that varies only in chromatic contrast along the R-G axis reduces the reading performance for CPS and RA. Individuals showed an approximate decline of two lines on an Arabic continuous text chart compared with a high-contrast achromatic chart. This information can be used to further develop a set of near-reading charts that can efficiently determine whether there is a differential loss in chromatic and achromatic sensitivity in patients with various vision disorders.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Alsalem et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: