Why the study?
Blood pressure can be estimated using photoplethysmographic pulse decomposition, but finding a more adequate decomposition function than Gaussian waves could improve estimates.
Does PPG pulse decomposition using hyperbolic secant waves improve blood pressure estimation accuracy compared to Gaussian wave decomposition in healthy volunteers?
Does PPG pulse decomposition using hyperbolic secant waves improve blood pressure estimation accuracy compared to Gaussian wave decomposition in healthy volunteers?
Hyperbolic secant wave decomposition of PPG signals provides more accurate blood pressure estimation than traditional Gaussian wave decomposition.
Hypothesis-generating for sech wave PPG decomposition in BP estimation; prospective validation needed before clinical adoption.
Photoplethysmographic (PPG) pulses contain information about cardiovascular parameters. In particular, blood pressure can be estimated using PPG pulse decomposition analysis, which assumes that a PPG pulse is composed of the original heart ejection blood wave and its reflections in arterial branchings. Among pulse decomposition wave functions that have been studied in the literature, Gaussian waves are the most successful ones. However, a more adequate pulse decomposition function could be found to improve blood pressure estimates. In this paper, we propose pulse decomposition analysis using hyperbolic secant (sech) waves and compare results with corresponding Gaussian wave decomposition. We analyze how the parameters of each of the two types of decomposition waves correlate with blood pressure. For this analysis, continuous blood pressure data and PPG data were acquired from ten healthy volunteers. The blood pressure of volunteers was varied by asking them to hold their breath for up to 60 s. The results suggested sech wave decomposition had higher accuracy in estimating blood pressure than the Gaussian function. Thus, sech wave decomposition should be considered as a more robust alternative to Gaussian wave pulse decomposition for blood pressure estimation models.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nagasawa et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: