In this paper, the accuracy of the singularity expansion method (SEM) used for antenna characterization is investigated. A well-known limitation of the SEM is that pole extraction is very sensitive to noise. A comparison between two main methods of pole extraction is presented. The matrix pencil (MP) method and the Cauchy's method are used to extract poles from the radiated fields of a dipole antenna and two bowtie antennas. Results are presented for simulated fields, and the robustness to a white Gaussian noise is also analyzed. We show that the MP method allows working with lower SNR than Cauchy's method and is more accurate for field reconstruction.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sarrazin et al. (2014) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: