Why the study?
The clinical management of Brugada syndrome remains suboptimal, prompting evaluation of standard ECG spectral analysis for diagnosis and risk stratification.
Does ECG spectral analysis of the high-frequency content in the ST segment improve diagnosis and risk stratification in patients evaluated for Brugada Syndrome?
Does ECG spectral analysis of the high-frequency content in the ST segment improve diagnosis and risk stratification in patients evaluated for Brugada Syndrome?
Spectral analysis of the high-frequency content of the ST segment on standard ECG improves the diagnostic and prognostic accuracy of clinical variables in Brugada Syndrome.
May support adjunctive spectral ECG analysis in Brugada evaluation; leaves open prospective validation before practice change.
(1) Background: The clinical management of Brugada Syndrome (BrS) remains suboptimal. (2) Objective: To explore the role of standard electrocardiogram (ECG) spectral analysis in diagnosis and risk stratification. (3) Methods: We analyzed 337 patients—43 with a spontaneous type I ECG pattern (Spont-BrS), 112 drug induced (Induct-BrS), and 182 with a negative response to the drug challenge (negative responders (NR)). ECGs were processed using the wavelet transform (high frequency: 85 to 130 Hz). (4) Results: The power of the high-frequency content in the ST segment (Total ST Power; nV2Hz−1103) was higher in BrS compared with NR patients (Spont-BrS: 28.126 (7.274–48.978) vs. Induc-BrS: 26.635 (15.846–37.424) vs. NR: 11.13 (8.917–13.343); p = 0.002). No differences were observed between ECG patterns in BrS patients. However, the Total ST Power of the type II or III ECG in NR patients was lower than in the same ECG patterns recorded from BrS patients (BrS: 31.07 (16.856–45.283); vs. NR: 10.8 (7.248–14.352) nV2Hz−1103; p = 0.007). The Total ST Power, age, and family history of BrS were independent predictors of positive responses to drug testing. Comparing models with versus those without Total ST Power, the area under the received operator curve (ROC) curve increased (with 0.607 vs. without 0.528, p = 0.001). Only syncope was associated with an increased risk (follow-up 55.8 ± 39.35 months). However, the area under the ROC curve increased significantly when the Total ST Power was included as a covariate (with 0.784 vs. without 0.715, p = 0.04). (5) Conclusions: The analysis of the high-frequency content of ECG signals increases the predictive capability of clinical variables in BrS patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Iglesias et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:
More from Journal of Clinical Medicine