Why the study?
Do spontaneous movements disturb the analysis of heart rate and blood pressure variability in healthy subjects?
Do spontaneous movements disturb the analysis of heart rate and blood pressure variability in healthy subjects?
Spontaneous movements significantly alter heart rate variability analysis, highlighting the need to control for movement in short-term cardiovascular variability studies.
Spontaneous movements may confound short-term HRV analysis; leaves open optimal movement-control protocols for future variability studies.
We hypothesized that spontaneous movements (postural adjustments and ideomotion) disturb analysis of heart rate and blood pressure variability and could explain the discrepancy between studies. We measured R-R intervals and systolic blood pressure in nine healthy sitting subjects during three protocols: 1) no movement allowed, 2) movements allowed but not standing, 3) movements and standing allowed. Heart rate and blood pressure were not altered by movements. Movements with or without standing produced a twofold or greater increase of the overall variability of R-R intervals and of the low-frequency components of spectral analysis of heart rate variability. The spectral exponent beta of heart rate variability (1. 123 at rest) was changed by movements (1.364), and the percentage of fractal noise (79% at rest) was increased by standing (91%, coarse-graining spectral analysis). Spontaneous movements could induce a plateau in the correlation dimensions of heart rate variability, but they changed its nonlinear predictability. We suggest that future studies on short-term cardiovascular variability should control spontaneous movements.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fortrat et al. (1999) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: