Why the study?
Baroreflex and autonomic reactivity to work-to-rest ratio-equated isometric exercise sessions in females had not been clarified.
Does a long set configuration compared to a short set configuration of isometric exercise alter autonomic and baroreflex responses in healthy females?
Does a long set configuration compared to a short set configuration of isometric exercise alter autonomic and baroreflex responses in healthy females?
Different isometric exercise set configurations elicit distinct physiological responses, with longer sets causing prolonged baroreflex gain reduction and shorter sets causing greater acute autonomic disturbance.
Set configuration may differentially affect autonomic recovery; leaves open optimal isometric protocols for females.
Different resistance exercise set configurations seem to lead to distinct hemodynamic, baroreflex and autonomic responses. Nevertheless, both the baroreflex and the autonomic reactivity to an equated work-to-rest ratio (W:R-equated) isometric exercise (IE) session in females still must be clarified. Thus, the present work investigated the autonomic and baroreflex responses of two W:R-equated isometric exercise sessions in female participants. Nine healthy females (25 ± 3 years) performed two isometric protocols equated by W:R with 30% 1-RM - a long set configuration (LSC): 4 sets x 2 min isometric x 2 min rest; and a short set configuration (SSC): 16 sets x 30 s isometric x 24s rest. Blood pressure (BP) and cardiac intervals were monitored by photoplesthysmography and electrocardiogram before, during and after (immediately, 30 and 60 min) exercise. The time domain parameters and frequency domain measures of the heart rate variability were calculated along with the baroreflex gain and effectiveness. A two-way repeated measures ANOVA was applied. Both protocols evoked a reduction in the baroreflex gain, whereas the LSC gain reduction lasted longer (30 and 60 minutes). Only the SSC was able to lower the root mean square of successive differences between normal heart beats (RMSSD) during exercise, when compared to pre-session values (p < 0.05). The standard deviation of the normal-to-normal interval (SDNN) increased during exercise with the LSC protocol (p<0.05). The high-frequency (HF) band only decreased during exercise using the SSC protocol (p < 0.05), while the LF/HF ratio was also only elevated in the SSC during exercise (p<0.05). The LSC evoked more prolonged reductions in the baroreflex gain, while the SSC protocol caused a greater disturbance in cardiac autonomic modulation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Reis et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: