Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The first known example of a human female with more than one euchromatic X chromosome in somatic cells is presented, viz. a child with 2 normal X chromosomes and the long arm of a third X translocated onto one of the No. 22 chromosomes. In cultured lymphocytes there occurred, in addition to the ordinary Lyon pattern of X chromosome inactivation, 2 other patterns in which (1) 2 normal X chromosomes, and (2) one X and the t(X;22) were euchromatic. As the inactivation within the translocation chromosome did not spread onto chromosome 22, the clinical symptoms of the child had to be attributed to the excess of active X material, not to monosomy 22. Contrary to this, absence of heterochromaty of the Y chromosome does not influence the phenotype, as shown by the case of mixed gonadal dysgenesis with non-fluorescing Y presented. Possible reasons for this difference include: (1) The differences between facultative X and constitutive Y heterochromatin; (2) Different cytologic criteria for heterochromatin may not mean the same kind of inactivity; (3) Differences in phenotypic expression may be due to different chromosomal behaviour among tissues; (4) Late replication and decondensation may not equate genetic inactivity in terms of transcriptional inactivity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Erica M. Bühler (2009) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: