Why the study?
Does an automated image segmentation method optimize the MR sequence set for plaque classification in carotid vessel wall images to balance scan duration and image quality?
Does an automated image segmentation method optimize the MR sequence set for plaque classification in carotid vessel wall images to balance scan duration and image quality?
An automated image segmentation method can optimize MR imaging protocols for carotid plaque classification, potentially reducing scan times by over 60% without significantly compromising performance.
May shorten carotid MRI protocols; leaves open prospective validation for plaque classification.
A typical MR imaging protocol to study the status of atherosclerosis in the carotid artery consists of the application of multiple MR sequences. Since scanner time is limited, a balance has to be reached between the duration of the applied MR protocol and the quantity and quality of the resulting images which are needed to assess the disease. In this study an objective method to optimize the MR sequence set for classification of soft plaque in vessel wall images of the carotid artery using automated image segmentation was developed. The automated method employs statistical pattern recognition techniques and was developed based on an extensive set of MR contrast weightings and corresponding manual segmentations of the vessel wall and soft plaque components, which were validated by histological sections. Evaluation of the results from nine contrast weightings showed the tradeoff between scan duration and automated image segmentation performance. For our dataset the best segmentation performance was achieved by selecting five contrast weightings. Similar performance was achieved with a set of three contrast weightings, which resulted in a reduction of scan time by more than 60%. The presented approach can help others to optimize MR imaging protocols by investigating the tradeoff between scan duration and automated image segmentation performance possibly leading to shorter scanning times and better image interpretation. This approach can potentially also be applied to other research fields focusing on different diseases and anatomical regions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Klooster et al. (2013) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:
More from PLoS ONE