Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Called in after discussions about prognosis between referring clinicians and patients, palliative care consultants sometimes find that the patient does not seem to understand what the referring clinician believes he or she explained. However, holding a more explicit discussion about prognosis may compromise the palliative care clinician's rapport with both the patient and the referring clinician. We therefore propose a two-part approach to explore apparent prognostic misunderstandings: first, generate a differential diagnosis for why the patient and referring clinician have different reports of what was said, and second, cultivate a partnership with the referring clinician to provide a unified patient care plan.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jacobsen et al. (2013) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: