In situ observations of tropospheric HO 2 obtained during four NASA airborne campaigns (SUCCESS, SONEX, PEM‐Tropics B and TRACE‐P) are reevaluated using the NASA Langley time‐dependent photochemical box model. Special attention is given to previously diagnosed discrepancies between observed and predicted HO 2 which increase with higher NO x (NO + NO 2 ) levels and at high solar zenith angles. This analysis shows that much of the model discrepancy at high NO x during SUCCESS can be attributed to modeling observations at timescales too long to capture the nonlinearity of HO x (OH+HO 2 ) chemistry under highly variable conditions for NO x . Discrepancies at high NO x during SONEX can be moderated to a large extent by complete use of all available precursor observations. Differences between kinetic rate coefficients and photolysis frequencies available for previous studies versus current recommendations also explain some of the disparity. Each of these causes is shown to exert greater influence with increasing NO x because of both the chemical nonlinearity between HO x and NO x and the increased sensitivity of HO x to changes in sources at high NO x . In contrast, discrepancies at high solar zenith angles will persist until an adequate nighttime source of HO x can be identified. It is important to note that other data sets from ground‐based field studies show a similar discrepancy between observed and predicted HO 2 for high NO x environments, and that the analysis presented here cannot resolve differences from those additional ground studies. Nevertheless, results from this study highlight important considerations in the application of box models to observationally based predictions of HO x radicals.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Olson et al. (2006) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: