Why the study?
Does magnetic microsphere labelling allow noninvasive MRI tracking of encapsulated insulin-producing cells without affecting their function?
Does magnetic microsphere labelling allow noninvasive MRI tracking of encapsulated insulin-producing cells without affecting their function?
Magnetic microsphere labelling enables noninvasive tracking of encapsulated insulin-producing cells using high-power MRI without impairing cell viability or function.
Hypothesis-generating for MRI tracking of encapsulated beta-cell grafts; clinical translation and 3 T feasibility require prospective validation.
Microencapsulated islets are usually injected free-floating into the peritoneal cavity, so the position of the grafts remains elusive after transplantation. This study aims to assess magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as a noninvasive means to track microencapsulated insulin producing cells following transplantation. Encapsulated insulin producing cells (MIN6 and human islets) were labelled with magnetic microspheres (MM), assessed for viability and insulin secretion, and imaged in vitro using a clinical grade 3 T MRI and in vivo using both clinical grade 3 T and research grade 11.7 T MRI. Fluorescent imaging demonstrated the uptake of MM by both MIN6 and human islets with no changes in cell morphology and viability. MM labelling did not affect the glucose responsiveness of encapsulated MIN6 and islets in vitro. In vivo encapsulated MM-labelled MIN6 normalized sugar levels when transplanted into diabetic mice. In vitro MRI demonstrated that single microcapsules as well as clusters of encapsulated MM-labelled cells could be visualised clearly in agarose gel phantoms. In vivo encapsulated MM-labelled MIN6 could be visualised more clearly within the peritoneal cavity as discrete hypointensities using the high power 11.7 T but not the clinical grade 3 T MRI. This study demonstrates a method to noninvasively track encapsulated insulin producing cells by MM labelling and MRI.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Vaithilingam et al. (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: