Why the study?
Genetic causes account for 45% of DCM cases, motivating investigation of an Iranian pedigree with familial DCM to decipher potential genetic causes in members developing arrhythmia, end-stage heart failure, and sudden death.
Identifies a novel pathogenic deletion in the DSP gene as a cause of familial dilated cardiomyopathy, expanding the genetic spectrum of the disease.
Novel DCM pedigree variant may inform arrhythmia risk; leaves open functional validation and replication before any clinical use.
BACKGROUND: Dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) is a progressive heart condition characterized by left ventricular chamber enlargement associated with systolic heart failure and prolonged action potential duration. Genetic variations in genes that encode cytoskeleton, sarcomere, and nuclear envelope proteins are responsible for 45% of cases. In our study, we focused on a pedigree with familial DCM to decipher the potential genetic cause(s) in affected members developing arrhythmia, end-stage heart failure, and sudden death. METHODS: Whole-exome sequencing (WES) was exploited for a 27-year-old heart-transplanted female as the proband, and the derived data were filtered using the standard pipelines. RESULTS: A 57-nucleotide deletion (c.405_422+39del) in the desmoplakin gene (DSP) (NM_004415.4) was identified as a novel pathogenic variant. Familial segregation analysis indicated that this variant is present in clinically affected members and absent in unaffected members. CONCLUSION: It seems that the detected variant induces intron retention, resulting in a premature stop codon in intron 3 of DSP leading to production of a truncated, nonfunctional protein. Additionally, it can trigger a nonsense-mediated mRNA decay pathway associated with inhibition of protein production. The present study results illustrated that a novel deletion in DSP can cause DCM in an Iranian family.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Eshaghkhani et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: