Why the study?
Animal studies suggested ketorolac could slow the progression of aortic aneurysms and dissections, but clinical data on its efficacy in acute Type A aortic dissection patients remained limited.
Does perioperative ketorolac improve clinical outcomes and safety in patients undergoing emergency surgical repair for acute Type A Aortic Dissection?
Does perioperative ketorolac improve clinical outcomes and safety in patients undergoing emergency surgical repair for acute Type A Aortic Dissection?
Perioperative ketorolac in acute Type A aortic dissection repair is safe and reduces intraoperative bleeding and ICU length of stay, though it does not significantly alter primary composite clinical outcomes.
Ketorolac did not improve primary outcomes after aTAAD repair; leaves open potential secondary benefits on bleeding and ICU stay for further study.
BACKGROUND: Acute Type A Aortic Dissection (aTAAD) is a severe and life-threatening condition. While animal studies have suggested that ketorolac could slow the progression of aortic aneurysms and dissections, clinical data on its efficacy in aTAAD patients remain limited. This study seeks to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of ketorolac in this patient group. METHODS: Patients were randomly assigned to receive either ketorolac or a placebo (0.9% saline). Treatment began at least 2 h prior to surgery (60 mg ketorolac or 2 ml saline administered once intramuscularly) and continued for 48 h post-surgery (30 mg ketorolac or 1 ml saline administered intramuscularly twice daily). The primary endpoints included assessing the safety and efficacy of ketorolac in improving the prognosis of aTAAD, focusing on mortality and organ malperfusion syndrome. Secondary endpoints included drug-related adverse events, blood test results, and other postoperative outcomes. RESULTS: Of 179 patients who underwent aTAAD repair, 110 met the inclusion criteria and were randomized into two groups of 55. One patient discontinued the intervention due to erythroderma on the first postoperative day, leaving 54 patients in the ketorolac group and 55 in the placebo group for analysis. No significant differences were found in the primary endpoints. However, the ketorolac group showed lower intraoperative bleeding (median: 1.8 L vs. 2.0 L, P = 0.03), shorter intensive care unit (ICU) stays (median: 6.5 days vs. 8 days, P = 0.04), and lower total hospital costs (median: ¥170,430 vs. ¥187,730, P = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Short-term ketorolac therapy did not alter the primary outcome but was associated with reduced intraoperative bleeding, shorter ICU stays, and potentially lower hospitalization costs. It demonstrates safety and a certain degree of effectiveness during the perioperative period. These findings suggest that ketorolac could be a viable option for perioperative management in patients with aTAAD. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial was registered at the Chinese Clinical Trial Register ( www.chictr.org.cn , No: ChiCTR2300074394).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lv et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: