Why the study?
Remanufactured single-use devices have become established in several healthcare systems, but published scientific evaluation regarding their relative safety or efficacy has been lacking.
Does a remanufactured circular mapping catheter maintain safety and efficacy compared to a newly manufactured catheter in patients undergoing AF ablation?
Does a remanufactured circular mapping catheter maintain safety and efficacy compared to a newly manufactured catheter in patients undergoing AF ablation?
The use of remanufactured circular mapping catheters for AF ablation appears safe and efficient, offering significant cost savings without compromising procedural success.
Supports potential cost savings with remanufactured catheters in AF ablation; leaves open need for randomized safety confirmation.
BACKGROUND: The use of remanufactured single-use devices (SUDs), including cardiac electrophysiology catheters, has become established in the USA and other health care systems but without much published scientific evaluation on the relative safety or efficacy of these devices. In the United Kingdom (UK), the use of remanufactured SUDs has not been routine. We performed a structured evaluation of the safety and efficacy of a remanufactured circular mapping catheter (Stryker® remanufactured Lasso NAV 2515) during its introduction in our centre. METHODS: We prospectively evaluated the performance of a remanufactured circular mapping catheter in 100 consecutive patients undergoing an AF ablation. Operator feedback was obtained, assessing the device appearance, ease of use and function. As an indirect measurement of efficacy, acute procedure metrics were compared to those in 100 propensity-matched cases performed by the same operators using a new device. Cost savings were calculated. RESULTS: No complication occurred in association with the remanufactured device. There was one reported failure of device malfunction-the flexion-extension mechanism of a remanufactured catheter and none in the matched-control group. There was satisfactory communication with the electro-anatomic mapping system. Ease of use of the remanufactured catheter was reported to be similar to a newly manufactured device. Procedural duration was similar with remanufactured devices and matched controls. With 100 cases using the remanufactured device, cost savings amounted to £30,444. CONCLUSIONS: The use of remanufactured circular mapping catheters is safe, efficient and reliable. Widespread use of remanufactured SUDs offers the possibility of significant economic benefit.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Leung et al. (2018) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: