Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
A stated goal for the latest revision of the DSM was improving the performance of the Axis II system. To evaluate the degree to which this goal was achieved, we performed a psychometric analysis of the Cluster B personality disorders (PD) as they are defined under the DSM-III-R and its successor the DSM-IV. Ninety-four patients with a primary PD diagnosis were rated for the presence of DSM-III-R and DSM-IV Cluster B PD criteria. From this symptom level data, the convergence, divergence, and internal consistency of the Cluster B criteria sets were determined. Also, kappa values were computed between the DSM-III-R and DSM-IV versions of these disorders as an index of coverage or agreement across the two systems. The results indicated that, in general, the DSM-IV Cluster B PDs represent an improvement over their DSM-III-R predecessors. However, some psychometric limitations, particularly regarding the convergence of the criteria sets, continue to be present.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Blais et al. (1997) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: