Why the study?
Does ticagrelor improve outcomes compared to current antiplatelet agents in patients with peripheral arterial disease?
Does ticagrelor improve outcomes compared to current antiplatelet agents in patients with peripheral arterial disease?
While current evidence is lacking for ticagrelor in PAD, its unique properties and potency suggest potential future utility requiring further investigation.
Ticagrelor should not be used in PAD on current evidence; leaves open targeted trials of its pleomorphic properties.
INTRODUCTION: Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) is a manifestation, and marker of severity, of a generalized atherosclerotic process. Antiplatelet therapy is recommended to prevent cardiovascular events but much of the evidence to support this is drawn from studies on older drugs. AREAS COVERED: In this review, the authors discuss the available evidence for the basis of current recommendations and review the data from Phase I to III trials on ticagrelor as a potential future treatment. This paper also reviews the properties of ticagrelor, its adverse effects, and how it differs from current recommended antiplatelet agents. As it is also more potent, a personalized approach to antiplatelet therapy may prove useful. It further highlights the additional effects of ticagrelor mediated by adenosine and their potential benefits, which may provide an explanation to its superior outcomes in trials comparing it with clopidogrel. EXPERT OPINION: Although there is a current lack of evidence to support the use of ticagrelor in patients with PAD, its unique pleomorphic properties make it attractive for future investigations and development of similar drugs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chong et al. (2014) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: