The relationship between the exchange of CO 2 and CH 4 and the surface area and depth of 16 pools on a northern peatland was investigated over 2 years. Differences in carbon gas emissions were found, with small, shallow pools (<1000 m 2 , <0.45 m) having consistently larger CO 2 and CH 4 fluxes of 0.35 ± 0.47 g C m −2 d −1 and 0.31 ± 0.69 g C m −2 d −1 , respectively. Average CH 4 fluxes decreased with increasing pool depth and were between 1 and 5 times larger from shallow pools (0.3 m, p < 0.001) than from deeper pools (0.7 m). Average CO 2 fluxes also generally decreased with increasing pool depth and were between 1 and 4 times larger from shallower pools (0.3 m, 0.45 m, p < 0.004) than from deeper pools (0.75 m). Average pool C‐CO 2 losses in 2005 were approximately 3 to 30 times lower (0.11 g C m −2 ) than dark respiration CO 2 losses from the adjacent vegetated section of the peatland. All pools, regardless of size, were atmospheric sources of CO 2 and CH 4 over the sampling period at an average emission ratio of 1C‐CO 2 :1.5C‐CH 4 , with total carbon losses of 20.1 g C m −2 and 29.6 g C m −2 over 2004 and 2005. Consistently larger fluxes to atmosphere of both CO 2 and CH 4 from shallow pools (<0.45 m) suggest that enhanced decomposition could be occurring, accounting for the differences in carbon gas exchange.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
McEnroe et al. (2009) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: