Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This study evaluated different strategies for use of a simple first‐order kinetic model (N min = N 0 [1‐e − k t ] where N 0 is potentially mineralizable N and k is the mineralization rate constant) to predict growing season soil N supply (SNS) in potato ( Solanum tuberosum L.) fields under cool humid climatic conditions. Direct application of the kinetic model for the 0‐ to 15‐cm depth significantly underestimated a field‐based measure of plant available soil N supply (PASNS). Modeling strategies that considered the soil mineral N (SMN) present at the start of the growing season, or included a pool of labile mineralizable N (Pool I) not normally considered in determination of N 0 , performed better, but still underestimated high values of PASNS. Strategies which included a greater soil depth (0–30 cm), or which assumed that the mineralizable N pool was replenished during the growing season, overestimated PASNS. A strategy which used a higher value of k for Pool I gave the most promising results. Results of this study highlight the importance of considering both SMN and labile mineralizable N pools in predicting SNS, and suggest that it is possible to estimate growing season SNS in humid regions using simple kinetic models.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dessureault‐Rompré et al. (2011) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: