We present the first spatially resolved wetland δ 13 C(CH 4 ) source signature map based on data characterizing wetland ecosystems and demonstrate good agreement with wetland signatures derived from atmospheric observations. The source signature map resolves a latitudinal difference of ~10‰ between northern high‐latitude (mean −67.8‰) and tropical (mean −56.7‰) wetlands and shows significant regional variations on top of the latitudinal gradient. We assess the errors in inverse modeling studies aiming to separate CH 4 sources and sinks by comparing atmospheric δ 13 C(CH 4 ) derived using our spatially resolved map against the common assumption of globally uniform wetland δ 13 C(CH 4 ) signature. We find a larger interhemispheric gradient, a larger high‐latitude seasonal cycle, and smaller trend over the period 2000–2012. The implication is that erroneous CH 4 fluxes would be derived to compensate for the biases imposed by not utilizing spatially resolved signatures for the largest source of CH 4 emissions. These biases are significant when compared to the size of observed signals.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ganesan et al. (2018) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: