The present study investigated the sources and fates of methylsiloxanes and their brominated products in one e-waste recycling area of China. During thermal (30–1000 °C) recycling experiments for printed wiring boards (PWBs), besides volatile methylsiloxanes (D4, D5, and D6), their monobrominated products, that is, D3D(CH 2 Br), D4D(CH 2 Br), and D5D(CH 2 Br), were also found by quadrupole time-of-flight gas chromatography–mass spectrometry to have 2–3 orders of magnitude lower emissions (0.31–1.3 μg/g) than those (18.1–866 μg/g) of parent methylsiloxanes. Overall, the fastest emissions of methylsiloxanes and bromo-methylsiloxanes occurred at 300–400 and 400–500 °C, respectively, accounting for 35.3–51.0 and 39.4–82.1% of their total emission. In the e-waste recycling area, concentrations of D4–D6 were 1.1–75.0 μg/g dw [detection frequency (df) = 100%] in 31 dusts from PWB treatment workshops, while limits of detection (LOD) < 683 ng/g dw (df = 69–100%) in 48 surrounding soils were up to 3 orders of magnitudes higher than those in reference areas. Meanwhile, D3D(CH 2 Br)–D5D(CH 2 Br) were detected in both dusts (<LOD—1.2 μg/g dw, df = 48–52%) and soils (<LOD—70.3 ng/g dw, df = 23–77%) from the e-waste recycling area, but they were not present in reference samples. Simulating experiments showed that hydrolysis (9.07–378 d) and volatilization (8.55–1007 d) half-lives of monobrominated D4–D6 in soils were 1.6–5.0 times longer than those of their parent methylsiloxanes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Xu et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: