This consensus statement provides standardized performance metrics and identifies critical errors to avoid during patient-side assistance in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.
Consensus on errors in RARP assistance may inform training curricula; leaves open effects on complication rates.
Table S1. Delphi-consensus based summary of proposed errors (left column) and critical errors (right column) to be avoided during patient-side assistance in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy, structured according to the phases of ‘Part I: Docking and Setup’, ‘Part II: Intraoperative’ and ‘Part III: Undocking’. Please note: The publisher is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Würnschimmel et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: