Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Experimental study demonstrates selective rare earth element leaching from neutralized bauxite residue using maleic acid, highlighting enhanced selectivity over iron.
• Maleic acid was used for REE dissolution from bauxite residue of Bayer process. • CO2-neiutralized residue showed higher selectivity of REE dissolution and iron. • Higher REE dissolution rate was reached with unnetralized residue. • The acid concentration and temperature were identified as key dissolution factors. • 2nd order quadratic model provided a better statistical fit for the neutralized system. This study aims to develop a process for the selective dissolution of rare-earth elements (REEs) from unneutralized and CO 2 -neutralized bauxite residues, using maleic acid as a leaching agent. A Box–Behnken design was used to evaluate the influence of the liquid-to-solid ratio (20, 60, 100), temperature (25, 50, 75 °C) and maleic acid concentration (0.25, 0.625, 1 mol L -1 ). Analyses focused on the median points of the design showed slightly higher REE-dissolution rates in unneutralized residues, but accompanied by noticeable iron solubilisation. Neutralisation moderately reduced iron dissolution, thereby improving process selectivity in favour of REEs, a key parameter for optimising yield. Analysis of variance (ANOVA, α = 5 %) identified maleic acid concentration, followed by temperatur e , as the most influential factors on yield and selectivity, with conditional effects. Second-order quadratic models fit the data from neutralised residues better, suggesting enhanced compatibility due to physicochemical changes induced by neutralisation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dramou et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: