Why the study?
Does celecoxib 100 mg BID improve pain and function compared to 200 mg QD or placebo in patients with knee or hip osteoarthritis?
Does celecoxib 100 mg BID improve pain and function compared to 200 mg QD or placebo in patients with knee or hip osteoarthritis?
Celecoxib 100 mg BID may be the preferred dosage regimen over 200 mg QD for treating knee or hip osteoarthritis due to better efficacy and a lower incidence of skin adverse effects.
Supports 100 mg BID celecoxib as preferred regimen in knee/hip OA; extends meta-analytic evidence guiding optimal dosing.
This network meta-analysis aimed to investigate the effectiveness and safety of 100 mg BID and 200 mg QD oral celecoxib in the treatment of OA of the knee or hip. PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library were searched through from inception to August 2014. Bayesian network meta-analysis was used to combine direct and indirect evidences on treatment effectiveness and safety. A total of 24 RCTs covering 11696 patients were included. For the comparison in between the two dosage regimens, 100 mg BID oral celecoxib exhibited a greater probability to be the preferred one either in terms of pain intensity or function at the last follow-up time point. For total gastrointestinal (GI) adverse effects (AEs), both of the two dosage regimens demonstrated a higher incidence compared to the placebo group. Further analyses of GI AEs revealed that only 200 mg QD was associated with a significantly higher risk of abdominal pain when compared with placebo. Furthermore, 100 mg BID showed a significantly lower incidence of skin AEs when compared with 200 mg QD and placebo. Maybe 100 mg BID should be considered as the preferred dosage regimen in the treatment of knee or hip OA.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zeng et al. (2015) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: