Why the study?
Does eptifibatide compared with abciximab improve platelet inhibition before and after unfractionated heparin in patients undergoing PCI?
Does eptifibatide compared with abciximab improve platelet inhibition before and after unfractionated heparin in patients undergoing PCI?
Eptifibatide achieves superior platelet inhibition compared with abciximab during PCI, and its anti-platelet effect is not attenuated by the addition of unfractionated heparin.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Eptifibatide was associated with superior platelet inhibition unaffected by UFH in PCI; hypothesis-generating for clinical outcomes versus abciximab.
In 29 patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), we obtained blood samples at baseline, 10 minutes after standard weight-based abciximab (n=15) or double-bolus eptifibatide (n=14) and 5 minutes after unfractionated heparin (UFH; 70 U/kg bolus). The median percent inhibition was significantly higher in the eptifibatide group compared with the abciximab group both before (96.5% [94-100] vs. 85% [77-89.5] [adenosine diphosphate; ADP]; 89.5% [84-95] vs. 59% [37.5-76.5] [thrombin receptor agonist peptide; TRAP], p<0.001 for both) and after UFH (95% [93-100] vs. 79% [68.8-87.5] [ADP]; 82% [77-93] vs. 51% [34.5-71.3] [TRAP], p<0.001 for both). Addition of UFH significantly reduced platelet inhibition in the abciximab group (85% [77-89.5] vs. 79% [68.8-87.5] [ADP]; 59% [37.5-76.5] vs. 51% [34.5-71.3] [TRAP], p<0.05 for both) but not in the eptifibatide group (96.5% [94-100] vs. 95% [93-100] [ADP]; 89.5% [84-95] vs. 82% [77-93] [TRAP], p=ns for both). Eptifibatide achieved superior platelet inhibition before but especially after UFH compared with abciximab.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Deliargyris et al. (2006) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: